First-charge bridging
If the existing mortgage will be repaid rather than kept in place, a first-ranking bridging facility may be more relevant.
Compare first-charge bridging →Short-term property finance secured behind an existing first-charge mortgage or loan, for borrowers who need additional capital without automatically replacing the first facility.
Lockwell Finance helps property owners, landlords and investors explore second charge bridging where there is sufficient equity, a clear purpose for the funds and a credible route to repay the short-term loan.

A second charge bridging loan is a short-term loan secured against property where another lender already holds the first legal charge.
Instead of refinancing the whole first-charge facility, the borrower raises additional short-term capital behind it. Because the second-charge lender ranks behind the first lender, the existing mortgage balance, property value, available equity and combined loan-to-value all matter.
The arrangement can be useful where replacing the first mortgage is not desired or practical, but the property has enough equity to support additional secured borrowing. The first-charge lender’s terms and any consent requirements also need to be considered.

A property owner may want short-term access to equity while keeping the existing first-charge mortgage in place.
Additional borrowing against one property may help fund a deposit, acquisition or time-sensitive opportunity elsewhere, subject to lender criteria and the exit.
A second charge bridge may provide short-term capital for works where there is enough equity in the security and a clear repayment route.
For suitable cases, property equity may support short-term borrowing for a defined business or investment purpose, depending on lender appetite and structure.
Some borrowers explore a second charge where replacing the entire first mortgage would be unnecessary, impractical or inconsistent with the short-term funding need.
A second charge facility can potentially bridge a short-term gap until a sale, refinance, asset disposal or other evidenced repayment event occurs.
Borrowing behind an existing first mortgage can differ materially from refinancing that mortgage, raising equity for a new investment or funding property works. The right structure depends on the value of the security, existing balances, combined leverage, lender consent where required and a viable repayment strategy.
If the existing mortgage will be repaid rather than kept in place, a first-ranking bridging facility may be more relevant.
Compare first-charge bridging →Explore short-term capital raised against existing property equity for a defined purchase, project or investment purpose.
Explore capital-raising bridging →For property works where lender assessment needs to consider the existing borrowing, refurbishment budget and planned exit.
Explore refurbishment bridging →Understand short-term finance with a planned buy-to-let refinance exit, subject to the future mortgage lender’s requirements.
Explore bridge-to-let finance →For HMO purchases, conversions or improvement works where licensing and longer-term funding plans must be considered.
Explore HMO bridging finance →Where a time-critical refinance or property transaction requires early review of valuation, legal readiness and exit.
Explore urgent bridging options →Already have a mortgage and need additional short-term capital? Send Lockwell your finance details →, including the property address and estimated value, first-charge lender and balance, any other charges, amount required, intended use of funds, borrower structure, deadline and proposed exit. Please say if the property is or will be your home so the applicable regulatory position can be considered. Availability remains subject to lender criteria and legal requirements.

A first-charge lender is repaid ahead of a second-charge lender from the secured property, which is why second-charge underwriting looks closely at the debt already sitting ahead of the new loan.
The lender will normally consider the current first-charge balance, the amount being raised, the property value, combined leverage, borrower profile, purpose of funds and exit strategy.
Consent or restrictions under the existing first-charge facility can also affect whether the proposed structure is possible.
The current value, property type, location, tenure and suitability as security.
The amount already secured ahead of the proposed second charge and the terms affecting further borrowing.
The first and second charge balances considered together against the property’s value.
Why the additional borrowing is required and how the capital will be used.
Whether the case is personal, joint, company or SPV-led, alongside the wider financial position.
The evidence behind the proposed sale, refinance or other repayment route for the bridge.
Second charge bridging becomes much easier to assess when the lender can see exactly what is already secured against the property, how much additional capital is needed and how the short-term facility will be cleared.

Useful first details: property address and value, first-charge lender and balance, amount required, purpose of funds, borrower structure, deadline and proposed repayment strategy.
Provide the property value, existing mortgage balance and ownership structure.
Explain how much you need, why you need it and the transaction deadline.
Set out how the second-charge bridge is intended to be repaid.
The case can then be considered against lenders willing to take a second-charge position.
It is a short-term loan secured against a property behind an existing first-charge mortgage or loan. The first-charge lender ranks ahead of the second-charge lender over the security.
Potentially. That is one of the reasons a second charge may be considered, but the existing mortgage terms, lender requirements, available equity and overall transaction must support the structure.
It depends on the existing facility and the proposed structure. The first-charge lender’s terms and any restrictions or consent requirements need to be checked as part of the case.
Lenders commonly consider the property value, first-charge balance, amount required, combined leverage, borrower, purpose of funds and the strength of the exit strategy.
Potentially. The lender will want to understand the works, costs, available equity, property value and how the facility will ultimately be repaid.
Pricing varies by lender and transaction. Total costs can include interest, lender fees, valuation, legal costs, broker fees and other applicable charges, so the full facility should be reviewed rather than only the headline rate.
If you already have a first-charge mortgage and need short-term additional capital, send the key figures and proposed exit so we can discuss the routes that may fit.